Monday, November 28, 2016
Wednesday, November 16, 2016
Thursday, November 10, 2016
Attitudinal Responses
The idea of automatic attitudinal responses is an intriguing
concept to me, particularly because I’ve felt that I have had very different
responses than people in my normal social group. This has been a significant
source of frustration for me in every day conversation and other heated
discussions. As I ponder on what has caused me to have the responses that I do,
the thing that comes to mind is first my family, but then more particularly my
dad when it comes to disagreement. My dad consistently pushed me to question
all sides and challenged me when I couldn’t back up my own position. I think
all of the discussion with my dad has caused me to side with him without
question at this point. I’d like to think that I still have a brain of my own
though, very much thanks to my mom. My mother, very opposite of my dad, doesn’t
have those big discussions with me, but she has taught to keep an open mind and
be very sympathetic towards others. This means after immediately picking my
side, which usually lines up with something I’ve learned from my dad, I step
back and question things like my dad taught me and then try to understand like
my mama taught me.
So my parents are definitely very influential in shaping my
initial reactions, but I know I have had my own experiences that speak to my
responses. Some of my interactions and situations I’ve dealt with in college
definitely shaped my reaction to the use of trigger warnings, which I discussed
at the beginning of the semester. I don’t know that trigger warnings are things
that my dad would support, but some traumatic experiences I’ve had definitely
made me quick to snap at those in the class who thought they were stupid and
unnecessary.
Being biased isn’t a bad thing. We all have biases and I
think discussion, or more likely argumentation, is far more productive if we
let those biases influence our words. In addition, being objective isn’t any
fun. These biases become a problem though when we let them blind us completely
from another’s point of view. I have been unfriended on Facebook for being
controversial and offering an alternative perspective. I think that’s a
problem. If a person’s automatic attitudinal response is to get pissy and unfriend
someone who has a different opinion, that person won’t be able to gain anything
from the situation. If all you’re doing is looking for someone to agree with
you, it’s probably best not to say anything. To be able to grow and to view
things from different perspectives, we need to let our biases play a part, but
not so big of one that we are no longer able to consider an alternate view.
Wednesday, November 2, 2016
On The Media: The Polling Conspiracy
This week I listened to The Polling Conspiracy from Poor Judgment. The first thing I realized when listening to this was how much more complicated polls are than I thought they were. Apparently I am not alone in that either because Donald Trump seems to not know exactly what some of the terms mean or how they are conducted. He does not understand what oversampling or voter suppression are. He believes the polls are being manipulated to give the impression that Hillary is doing better than she is.
Gingrich talked about two alternative universes that we've created and I guess I agree. I don't think there is enough poll participation or correct use of poll information for us to all be on the same page. They used the example of one 19 year old black male being counted for like 30 times, giving the impression that Trump was doing better with black voters than he actually was. When this particular voter stopped participating in the polls, the numbers were thrown off greatly again. People change party affiliation, without necessarily changing their registration, people don't respond to requests to participate in the polls and take surveys, and use of the internet in gathering data is still a bit unclear.
Pollsters can travel the country, make a million phone calls, and study the demographics all day and night, but I really think all we know for sure is that we don't know what's going to happen because polls have been very wrong before and the way they are conducted is changing. I think that's the general theme of this election as well. We don't know what's going to happen.
Gingrich talked about two alternative universes that we've created and I guess I agree. I don't think there is enough poll participation or correct use of poll information for us to all be on the same page. They used the example of one 19 year old black male being counted for like 30 times, giving the impression that Trump was doing better with black voters than he actually was. When this particular voter stopped participating in the polls, the numbers were thrown off greatly again. People change party affiliation, without necessarily changing their registration, people don't respond to requests to participate in the polls and take surveys, and use of the internet in gathering data is still a bit unclear.
Pollsters can travel the country, make a million phone calls, and study the demographics all day and night, but I really think all we know for sure is that we don't know what's going to happen because polls have been very wrong before and the way they are conducted is changing. I think that's the general theme of this election as well. We don't know what's going to happen.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)




